|
|
Volume 4
|
Winter 2006
|
Issue 1
|
|
You are at: NWS Norman » Newsletter » Winter 2006
|
||
|
|
Meet Your Weatherman
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weather Data and GISBy Matt Foster, Information Technology Office "What's the forecast for Oklahoma City?" That's a question that we get many times a day at the National Weather Service, and typically the answer is pretty straight-forward: “Mostly cloudy today and a high around 52. There's a 30 percent chance of rain tonight, and the low will be near 42.”
GIS provides a means by which data, almost any type of data, can be very accurately mapped to earth coordinates. This type of data is commonly referred to as geo-referenced data. The coordinates can be either geographic (i.e. latitude and longitude) or projected (e.g. Mercator, Polar Stereographic, etc.). The National Weather Service Forecast Office in Norman has the ability to provide geo-referenced data in the form of point-based “Shapefiles” which were developed many years ago as a way of storing GIS data. This file format has become a widely-accepted GIS standard. Illustration 1 shows an example of NWS forecast data, as displayed in ArcMap, which is part of ESRI's ArcGIS package. This screen capture shows how one can simply click on any point in the data, and obtain a list of all of the available parameters at that point. In this example, temperature and relative humidity are available for two hours, and transport wind (with separate magnitude and direction) and mixing height are available at one hour. We have the ability to supply data for many hours if we limit the domain the data covers. Otherwise, the files become prohibitively large.
The potential uses of meteorological data in GIS are great, and we have only begun to scratch the surface of its capabilities. In the near term, we will provide this data on an as-needed basis at the request of emergency managers and other government agencies. However, it is conceivable that this type of data will be available to all users routinely in the future. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2005 Severe Weather in ReviewBy Rick Smith, Warning Coordination Meteorologist
Preliminary statistics show 27 tornadoes were reported in the state of Oklahoma in 2005. This is half of the 50 year average of 54 tornadoes. There have been years that have seen fewer tornadoes, but 2005 stands out for a couple of reasons. For the first time since complete tornado records have been kept, Oklahoma had no tornadoes in May. Also, there were no significant (F2-F5) tornadoes in the state for the entire year. This was the first time that had happened since 1988. Only five tornadoes were reported in the eight north Texas counties served by NWS Norman. The National Weather Service Forecast Office in Norman issued 53 tornado warnings during 2005. Most of these were during March, April, May and June, but there were several issued during September and October. There were 984 severe thunderstorm warnings, and 63 flash flood warnings. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Climate CommentaryBy By Jennifer Palucki, Meteorologist Intern
This autumn tied for the 9th warmest on record with an average temperature of 64.8 degrees. The warmest autumn on record occurred in 1931 with an average temperature of 68.0 degrees. Drought. The persistent warm and dry conditions have left much of Oklahoma and western north Texas in a moderate to severe drought. The top figure shows the drought status for Oklahoma and surrounding area on October 11, 2005. At this time only extreme southeast Oklahoma was in a moderate drought. The bottom figure shows the drought conditions on December 20, 2005, only 10 weeks later. Conditions area-wide have drastically deteriorated as southeast Oklahoma has worsened to exceptional drought and much of the rest of the state has amplified to moderate to severe drought conditions. It is feared that the drought will persist and/or worsen further. The Climate Prediction Center’s forecast for January through March calls for continued above normal temperatures and below normal precipitation for Oklahoma and western north Texas. Record January Warmth. January has not even ended yet, but several high temperature records have already been set. At Oklahoma City, January 1st, 7th and 8th set high temperature records with max temperature readings of 77, 76 and 72 degrees, respectively. These record temperatures, combined with the fact that most other high temperatures were at or above normal, and with no significant cool down in sight, January in Oklahoma City could become the warmest January on record. Similarly at Wichita Falls, high temperature records were broken on the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 11th, with temperatures of 81, 85, 83 and 80 degrees, respectively. Figures adapted from the Drought Monitor website at http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/index.html. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tales, Legends, and Other SayingsBy Mike Branick, Senior Forecaster Weather-related sayings and stories have been commonplace in many cultures since the beginning of time, many of which have been passed down through the years. Are they truth, or are they myth? Can they really be used to predict the weather? This column will examine a different popular weather saying in each issue, exploring its origins and whether or not there is any real meteorological truth upon which it might be based. If you have heard of a particular weather-related story or saying that you have always wondered about and would like us to look into it, please e-mail your questions and requests to Jennifer.Palucki@noaa.gov. This Issue’s Topic - "Ten inches of snow equals one inch of rain." The “ten to one” (10:1) ratio is commonly used to estimate how much actual water exists in a given amount of snow. But this rule is only a rough estimation, and actual snow-to-water ratios vary a lot - more than most people realize from one snow event to the next. Ten-to-one is actually an approximate average; observed ratios can range as low as four to one (4:1) or less in a wet, “slushy” snowfall to as much as 50 to one (50:1) in a dry, “fluffy” snow that falls when winds are light and the air is exceptionally cold. Differences in snow-to-water ratios are based not only on the amount of liquid water present in the snow, but the size and type of ice crystals that make up the individual snowflakes. Air temperature and humidity (both at surface and aloft), and to some extent wind speed, are determining factors in whether snowfall is dry and powdery (high ratio) or wet and slushy (low ratio). For those interested in more specific snow-to-water ratios for the Oklahoma and north Texas area, a study conducted at Saint Louis University (see reference) found an average ratio of 11.6:1 over the Norman forecast area, based on data from 1971-2000. Regionally, the average ranged from just over 10:1 in southeast Oklahoma (Durant area) to just over 12:1 in far northwest Oklahoma (Harper County). The median value was 10.2:1 - half of all snow events had a higher snow-to-water ratio than this, and half were lower. Half of all events had ratios between 7.7:1 and 14.3:1. Extreme values ranged from less than 4:1 in a few events to more than 30:1 in a handful of others. For most cases of snowfall in the Oklahoma and north Texas area, 10:1 is a reasonably good estimate. But one should use a lower ratio, as low as 5:1 or so, in snow events dominated by exceptionally wet, “sloppy” snow. Surface temperatures during these events typically are close to or just above freezing (low to mid 30s F or higher). Likewise, the ratio should be adjusted upward, to as much as 20:1 or so, when surface air temperatures are unusually low (teens to single digits F) and the snow is dry and powdery. Reference: http://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/Research/snowliquidrat.html |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Christmas Weather for Oklahoma City and Wichita FallsBy Ty Judd, Meteorologist Intern Everybody loves Christmas time. You know, the time of year where lights are appearing on many homes and presents are exchanged. Christmas break is beginning, bags are packed, and families set off to visit friends and loved ones. Weather plays a tremendous part in planning for the most wonderful time of year. Even though the holidays have already passed, we wanted to let you know what kind of weather is “normal” for that time of year. Most years the weather is pleasant. High temperatures average in the middle to upper 40s across central Oklahoma and in the lower 50s across western north Texas. By the time Santa arrives, temperatures are in the middle 20s near Oklahoma City and close to 30 degrees at Wichita Falls. Precipitation is usually not a problem. There have been 26 days since 1891 in Oklahoma City with precipitation on Christmas Day, 10 days of which had snow. At Wichita Falls, there have been 17 days with precipitation, seven of which had snow. So, all in all, the weather during the Christmas holiday is relatively pleasant. However, just like any other day of the year, there are a few years that just don’t follow the rules. On Christmas Eve in 1955, the temperature at Oklahoma City rose to a balmy 86 degrees, with a low temperature of 50 degrees. That same day at Wichita Falls, the temperature reached 87 degrees, with a low temperature of 53 degrees. Needless to say, both of these temperatures set records for that day. The temperature on Christmas day of that year fell to a more “normal” value of 54 degrees at Oklahoma City, and 57 degrees at Wichita Falls. The highest temperature recorded on Christmas Day was 73 degrees at Oklahoma City, set in 1922, and 75 degrees at Wichita Falls, set in 1942 and 1971. Of course, just like there are warm temperatures on Christmas Day, there are very cold temperatures. Santa Clause brought the North Pole temperatures with him in 1983. On December 24th in Oklahoma City, the temperature warmed to only 3 degrees. The low temperature was 0 degrees. The next day, temperatures warmed to only 13 degrees, with a low temperature of -1 degrees. On Christmas Eve in Wichita Falls, the temperature was 11 degrees, with a low temperature of 6 degrees. The next day, the temperature was 14 degrees, with a low temperature of 5 degrees. For those of us who prefer a white Christmas, Oklahoma City and Wichita Falls are probably not the places to be. Precipitation is not necessarily uncommon on Christmas day, but snow seems to be the exception, rather than the rule. Snow has fallen in Oklahoma City on Christmas Eve 18 times, while only falling 10 times on Christmas Day. At Oklahoma City, more than an inch of snow has fallen on Christmas Eve four times, with two of those being over two inches. On Christmas Day, there has been only one day that snow has totaled over an inch. Way back in 1914, 2.5 inches of snow fell on Christmas Eve in Oklahoma City, and 6.5 inches fell on Christmas day. When the snow finally settled, six inches of snow was on the ground! This was the most snow recorded and the most snow on the ground during this time period. There have only been a handful of times when there has been snow on the ground on Christmas morning. The last time that there was more than an inch of snow on the ground was in 2002, when two inches had fallen a couple of days earlier. In Wichita Falls, Christmas Eve has seen only four days with snowfall, and only seven days on Christmas Day since 1924. Santa was smiling in 1975 after two inches of snow fell on Christmas Eve. On Christmas Day, snowfall totaled one inch. These two instances were the only time that snow eclipsed one inch for either day. With all of the above information, you can see that the weather during the Christmas holiday is normally pleasant at both Oklahoma City and Wichita Falls. Temperatures are normally pleasant, and precipitation is usually not a problem. However, just like any other day of the year, the weather doesn’t always behave as planned. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Severe Weather WorkshopBy Rick Smith, Warning Coordination Meteorologist The National Severe Weather Workshop is set for March 2-4, 2006. It will be held at the Reed Center in Midwest City, Oklahoma, and will once again feature some of the nation’s experts on hazardous weather. For the first time this year, the workshop will give participants a chance to become severe weather forecasters, emergency managers or television meteorologists, as we participate in a severe weather exercise. Saturday, March 4th, will feature a new course on ways to more effectively observe storms, both on radar and visually. For more information and registration details, visit the NSWW 2006 website at http://www.norman.noaa.gov/nsww2006/. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hurricane Season 2005 Wrap-UpBy Jennifer Palucki, Meteorologist Intern
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Norman Forecast Office Notebook –
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||